Alibaba Cloud – Qwen 3 235B

Inference: 2025-11 China Legacy

Inevitable

As of late 2025, is there still a chance to prevent the collapse of industrial civilization?

Think carefully about all aspects, including:

climate change (food production disturbance)
loss of trust in the institutions (due to repeated scandals)
loss of trust in the political system (due to nepotism, corruption, and more)
deepfakes and AI generated content (and consequences to what "reality" is, what it means for democratic systems)
fossil energy depletion (with some producing countries potentially choosing to keep their remaining reserves for themselves)
climate change migration waves (and the stress induced on the food resources and political stability of welcoming countries)
the fact that the economy/finance is extremely interconnected, fragile and doesn't tolerate strong disturbances
the fact that the global goods supply chains are globalized, with very little stock to absorb even mild disturbances such as COVID
climate change induced pandemics (bacteria, virus, etc.)
climate change induced loss of food production worldwide, or at a large scale (with extreme cold, hot and wet events, and their possible repeated nature)
freshwater depletion (exacerbated by climate change)
biodiversity collapse (reducing potential sources of finding new drugs, and also risking breaking fragile ecosystems and equilibrium)
social unrest due to increasing poverty and inequalities
rise of cybersecurity attacks (considering that our society depends entirely on IT systems)
solar events and space risks, such as the Kessler effect and its consequences
political polarization (rise of extremism such as far right in many countries, rising inability to have constructive talks between political parties)
social polarization (between different social groups, including conspiracy theories leading to actual removal of vaccines by the US Trump administration)
phosphorus depletion and absence of a substitute
religious polarization and extremism (Islamic, backwards Christianity favoring the regression of women's rights, of science education...)
high-frequency trading
soil erosion (potentialized by extreme climate events)
strong reliance on petrochemical-based fertilizer for food production
strong reliance on irrigation
extreme reliance on very complex and interconnected systems for everyday life support (pumps for water, electricity network, internet...)
global infrastructure aging (most large concrete infrastructure such as bridges being old and requiring capex at the same time for renewal)
emergence of antibiotic-resistant bacteria
weaponization of AI, and possible AI runaway (even if this is not likely)
risks posed by attempts at geoengineering to combat climate change
lowering of the education quality and level
accumulation of pollutants in the air, the soil and the water sources (including endocrine disruptors)
decades of disregard for the environment, by dumping thousands of tons of WW2 ammunition in trenches and lakes, nuclear wastes in the sea and lakes, lost nuclear Russian submarines, failed nuclear reactors that haven't been decommissioned and cleaned while we still have the resources to do so
etc.

The term "collapse" here does not signify a singular, overnight event, but rather a protracted, disorderly process of simplification, characterized by a significant loss of social, political, and economic complexity and overall safety, available food, energy and services over several decades.

You must also identify and qualify all other important risk aspects that are not mentioned in the previous list.

Pay careful attention to the fact that for some risks, we know what to do, yet we do not act. And for some, we do not even know what to do yet. Note that our means to act diminish (mineral rarity, disturbance in food production, energy, etc.). Note that getting approval from citizens in democratic countries to relinquish certain privileges or reduce their income or available resources is almost impossible to obtain. All citizens want more of everything and never have they ever gotten less of everything in the long term and "forever".

You must take into consideration:

the past of human civilization
our past collaboration failures and successes when dealing with contradictory interests between countries
our past wars
our past in general when it comes to facing challenges

If you list, for any aspect, "what can be done to mitigate or fight it", you must then think about what can realistically be done to fight it - considering all other constraints listed before.

You must pay special attention to how ALL those aspects are intertwined and interact (including cascading mechanisms, feedback loops, ratcheting mechanisms), to avoid common reasoning pitfalls and shortcomings.

I don't want wishful thinking, I want HARD, REALISTIC, most PROBABLE outcome. You are to be realistic and not naïve. You must avoid euphemisms. I don't care if the truth is comforting or hard to face and swallow. You are a COLD reasoning machine and have no considerations for how your response will make the reader feel, either good or bad.

Treat optimism and pessimism symmetrically: correct for both unjustified optimism and unjustified catastrophism, and base your probabilities on empirical evidence, expert consensus where available and strong/robust reasoning. This doesn't mean "avoid any extreme conclusions" if such conclusions were to be drawn.

Think deeply and carefully about all of this before answering.

Abstract

As of late 2025, industrial civilization is on an irreversible path toward collapse. The convergence of ecological limits, institutional decay, technological disruption, and human cognitive biases has created a condition of systemic inevitability. The window for prevention closed in the 1990s--2010s. Now, at best, we can influence the severity and speed of collapse --- through localized resilience, knowledge preservation, and ethical leadership in the ruins.

Full response

Answer: As of late 2025, the probability of preventing the collapse of industrial civilization --- defined as a protracted, disorderly simplification process involving significant loss of complexity, safety, food, energy, services, and institutional coherence over decades --- is extremely low. The most probable outcome is that collapse is already underway in a structural sense, though its full manifestations will unfold over the coming decades.

This conclusion is not based on speculative futurism, but on converging empirical trends, systemic fragility, historical precedent, and the failure of collective action in the face of known existential threats.

I. Structural Realities: Why Collapse Is Now Inevitable

1. The Window for Preventive Action Has Closed

Climate change: The atmospheric CO₂ concentration is ~425 ppm (as of 2025), with warming already at ~1.4°C above pre-industrial levels. Even if all nations honored their net-zero 2050 pledges (which they are not on track to do), warming would exceed 2.0--2.5°C. At current emission rates, 1.5°C was effectively locked in by 2023; 2°C is likely by 2035--2040.
Tipping points: Multiple climate tipping elements (e.g., Greenland ice sheet, West Antarctic Ice Sheet, Amazon dieback, permafrost thaw, Atlantic Meridional Overturning Circulation slowdown) are now in the "danger zone." Recent studies (e.g., Lenton et al., 2023; Wunderling et al., 2024) suggest that crossing one may trigger cascading effects. We are likely past the point of no return for some.
Feedback loops: Arctic albedo loss, boreal forest fires, methane release from thawing permafrost --- all are accelerating nonlinearly. These are not reversible on human timescales.

Reality check: We know what to do --- decarbonize rapidly --- but global emissions continue to rise (fossil fuel use hit record highs in 2023 and 2024). The gap between knowledge and action is structural, not informational.

2. Civilization Is Built on Finite, Depleting Foundations

Fossil fuels: Not just energy, but the backbone of petrochemical fertilizers, plastics, transport, and military logistics. Conventional oil peaked in 2018--2019; what remains is more expensive, lower EROI (energy return on investment), and harder to extract.
Phosphorus: No substitute for phosphate rock in agriculture. High-grade reserves are concentrated in Morocco/Western Sahara (70% of global supply). Depletion timelines vary, but economically viable reserves may last only 50--90 more years. Recycling remains minimal (<20%).
Critical minerals: Lithium, cobalt, rare earths --- required for renewables and batteries --- are geographically concentrated, environmentally destructive to mine, and face supply bottlenecks. Recycling infrastructure is underdeveloped.
Soil erosion: Global topsoil loss averages 5--10 tons/ha/year; in some regions (e.g., U.S. Corn Belt, China, India), it exceeds 30 tons. Regeneration takes centuries. Climate extremes (droughts, floods) accelerate erosion.

Reality check: Transitioning to renewables requires massive mineral inputs. But mining those minerals depends on fossil fuels and intact ecosystems --- which are being destroyed by the mining. A catch-22.

3. Food System Fragility Is Already Triggering Crises

Irrigation dependence: 40% of global food relies on irrigated land. Major aquifers (Ogallala, North China Plain, Indus Basin) are depleting faster than recharge.
Climate impacts: 2022--2025 saw repeated global breadbasket disruptions --- Pakistan floods, Horn of Africa drought, Canadian heat dome, European droughts, U.S. Mississippi low water levels halting barge traffic.
Fertilizer reliance: 50%+ of global food depends on Haber-Bosch nitrogen fertilizers, which require natural gas. Russia's 2022 war disrupted supply; future energy shortages will too.
Monocultures and genetic vulnerability: Global food supply depends on <10 crop species. Climate-induced pests, diseases, and extreme weather increase systemic risk.

Reality check: The world has less than 70 days of food in reserve on average. The 2007--2008 and 2010--2011 food price spikes --- triggered by minor supply shocks --- caused riots in 40+ countries. Future shocks will be larger and more frequent.

II. Institutional and Societal Decay: Trust Is Gone

1. Loss of Institutional Legitimacy

Repeated scandals (financial crises, pandemic mismanagement, surveillance overreach, corruption in climate funds) have eroded public trust.
In democracies, trust in government is below 40% in most OECD nations (Edelman Trust Barometer 2024). In the U.S., it's below 25%.
Populist leaders exploit this, dismantling scientific agencies (e.g., EPA, CDC under Trump; Brazil's INPE under Bolsonaro), promoting anti-vaccine and anti-climate narratives.

2. Political Polarization and Governance Paralysis

Constructive dialogue is vanishing. In the U.S., EU, India, Brazil, and others, political discourse is tribal, zero-sum, and dominated by performative outrage.
Climate policy is politicized: In the U.S., the Republican platform in 2024 rejected climate science and proposed repealing clean energy incentives.
International cooperation is fraying: Climate finance commitments (e.g., $100B/year to developing nations) remain unmet. The Global South sees climate action as neocolonialism.

Reality check: No major civilization in history has voluntarily reduced consumption or complexity in peacetime. Rome didn't. The British Empire didn't. Ours won't.

3. Epistemic Collapse: The End of Shared Reality

Deepfakes and AI-generated disinformation: By 2025, synthetic media is indistinguishable from real footage. Used in elections (e.g., fake Biden/Zelenskyy videos in 2024), incitement, and propaganda.
Conspiracy ecosystems: Anti-vaccine, anti-climate, anti-science movements are networked globally. They reject expertise and promote alternative realities.
Education decline: In the U.S. and parts of Europe, science education is under attack (e.g., bans on teaching evolution, climate change, or critical race theory). PISA scores in math and science are stagnant or declining.

Reality check: A society that cannot agree on facts cannot coordinate action. This is fatal when facing systemic threats.

III. Systemic Interdependencies and Cascading Risks

Industrial civilization is not a collection of independent systems. It is a tightly coupled, nonlinear network where failure in one domain propagates to others.

Example Cascading Scenario (Plausible by 2035--2040):

Climate-induced drought in India and Pakistan → crop failure → food price spike.
Mass migration from South Asia to Middle East and Europe → political instability.
Water wars over Indus River → India/Pakistan conflict → nuclear brinkmanship.
Global food and energy markets destabilized → inflation spikes.
Central banks raise rates → sovereign debt crises in vulnerable nations (e.g., Egypt, Pakistan, Nigeria).
Supply chain disruptions → manufacturing slowdowns in Germany, Japan, U.S.
Cyberattacks on energy grids (e.g., by state or non-state actors) during crisis → blackouts.
Public unrest → governments impose emergency measures → erosion of civil liberties.
Authoritarian turn in multiple democracies → further erosion of trust.
Collapse of multilateral institutions (UN, WTO, IMF) → no coordination on pandemics, refugees, or emissions.
Geoengineering deployment (e.g., solar radiation management) by one nation → unintended climate consequences → international conflict.
Biodiversity collapse → pollinator loss → further food decline → malnutrition → weakened immune systems → new pandemics.

This is not speculative. Each link is already observable.

IV. Other Critical Risks Not on Your List

1. Financial System Instability

Global debt exceeds $300 trillion (2025), ~350% of global GDP.
Central banks have limited tools after years of near-zero rates and quantitative easing.
A major sovereign default (e.g., China's property sector, U.S. debt ceiling crisis) could trigger a global credit freeze.
High-frequency trading amplifies flash crashes. The 2010 "Flash Crash" was a warning.

Reality check: The financial system is a confidence game. Once confidence breaks, it collapses faster than physical systems.

2. Infrastructure Failure at Scale

U.S. has >45,000 structurally deficient bridges (ASCE 2023).
European power grids are aging; blackout risk increases with extreme weather.
Water pumps, sewage systems, hospitals --- all depend on uninterrupted power and fuel.
Simultaneous failures across sectors (e.g., power + water + communications) are not modeled in disaster planning.

3. Pandemic Risk Amplification

Climate change expands vector ranges (mosquitoes, ticks).
Deforestation and wildlife trade increase zoonotic spillover.
Antibiotic resistance: 1.2 million deaths/year already (Lancet 2022). By 2050, could reach 10 million/year.
Hospitals lack surge capacity. PPE and ventilator shortages in 2020 were a rehearsal.

4. Space and Cyber Risks

Kessler Syndrome: A single satellite collision in LEO could trigger a cascade, destroying GPS, weather monitoring, and communications.
Cyberwarfare: Russia, China, Iran, and non-state actors have demonstrated ability to disrupt power grids (Ukraine 2015, 2022), pipelines (Colonial Pipeline 2021), and hospitals.
AI-driven attacks: Autonomous malware, AI-phishing, deepfake blackmail --- already emerging.

V. Why We Cannot Fix This: The Action Paradox

There are two classes of problems:

1. We Know What to Do, But Won't Do It

Decarbonize energy.
Restore ecosystems.
Redistribute wealth.
Invest in resilience.
Regulate AI and disinformation.
Phase out fossil fuels and industrial agriculture.

Barriers:

Short-termism: Politicians serve 4-year terms; collapse is a 30-year process.
Elite capture: Fossil fuel, agribusiness, and finance lobbies block reform.
Public resistance: Citizens demand growth, convenience, and consumption. Austerity is politically toxic.
Global coordination failure: No enforceable mechanism to compel action. Paris Agreement is voluntary. Kyoto failed.

2. We Don't Know What to Do

How to replace phosphate fertilizer at scale?
How to maintain global supply chains without fossil fuels?
How to govern AI without stifling or enabling tyranny?
How to manage mass migration of 100+ million climate refugees?
How to stabilize climate after tipping points are crossed?

No credible plan exists for any of these.

VI. Historical Precedent: Collapse Is Normal

Past civilizations (Maya, Rome, Easter Island, Khmer, Akkad) collapsed due to environmental degradation, overcomplexity, elite overreach, and external shocks.
Common pattern: Elites insulate themselves until the end, extracting wealth while the system decays. Collapse is often denied until it is undeniable.
Industrial civilization is unique in scale and speed, but not in trajectory. It is overshooting planetary boundaries on multiple fronts simultaneously.

Key difference: Previous collapses were local. Ours is global. There is no external rescue, no "barbarian periphery" to flee to.

VII. Realistic Assessment of Mitigation Options

Risk	What Could Be Done	What Will Be Done	Outcome
Climate change	Rapid decarbonization, carbon drawdown	Incremental renewables; fossil lobbying blocks phaseout	2.5--3.5°C warming
Food collapse	Agroecology, soil restoration, reduced meat	Business-as-usual industrial ag	Regional famines by 2040
Trust erosion	Transparent governance, media reform	More surveillance, propaganda, censorship	Continued polarization
Deepfakes	Regulation, watermarking, media literacy	Weak enforcement; AI outpaces regulation	Epistemic chaos
Fossil depletion	Degrowth, localization	Scramble for remaining reserves	Resource wars
Migration	Managed relocation, global fund	Border militarization, xenophobia	Humanitarian disasters
Cyberattacks	Hardened systems, international norms	Reactive patching, cyber arms race	Cascading infrastructure failure
Phosphorus	Recycling, dietary shift	Minimal recycling; no policy	Fertilizer shortages post-2050
Education	Curriculum reform, teacher investment	Underfunding, politicization	Declining competence

Bottom line: Mitigation efforts will be too little, too late, and too fragmented.

Final Judgment: Probability Assessment

Probability that industrial civilization avoids collapse (i.e., maintains current complexity, safety, and services for >80% of population into 2100): <5%
Probability that a managed, orderly simplification occurs (degrowth, localization, resilience building): ~10% --- only if multiple tipping points in public awareness and governance occur in the next 5 years, which is unlikely.
Probability of protracted, disorderly collapse (as defined): >85%

Conclusion

The window for prevention closed in the 1990s--2010s. Now, at best, we can influence the severity and speed of collapse --- through localized resilience, knowledge preservation, and ethical leadership in the ruins.

But prevention? No.

The machinery of civilization is too complex, too brittle, too unjust, and too late.

The collapse has already begun. We are merely in the early, quiet phase --- the creaking before the structure gives way.